Susan Davis (futabachan) wrote,
Susan Davis
futabachan

  • Mood:
  • Music:

Audre Lourde and sacred cows

Riki Wilchins and Patricia Ireland came to Rochester last night to give a lecture at RIT as part of their women's week. Riki did her usual riff on gender and postmodernism and how Labels Are Bad, and banged the drum to try to recruit people for GenderPAC. (bcholmes, you'll be interested to know that she also brought up the inevitable anecdote about being asked which way she had transitioned....) Patricia followed up by quoting Audre Lourde about how "the master's tools can never dismantle the master's house."

Everywhere I go in my activism, someone invariably trots out that quote, and I've never understood why it is quoted and accepted so uncritically. Why can't the master's tools dismantle the house? Couldn't they possibly be the most effective ones? And can't the master's gun shoot the master dead?

No one has ever been able to satisfactorily explain the passage to me, even people who use it to cut off debate. I asked Patricia about it afterwards, and she admitted that it's a "challenging" passage... and that in her current work, she found tools such as voting and legal action to be quite effective.

So... what am I missing here? And why has this become an unquestioned article of faith among progressive activists?
Tags: lgbt, politics
Subscribe

  • "That's it! I'm moving to Canada!"

    I've heard quite a few American friends postulate moving to Canada if the Presidential election in the fall doesn't go their way. Amanda and I moved…

  • What we've been up to lately.

  • Plenary update

    Wow, it's been a while since I've updated this. Most of the rest of the naginata folks in Toronto use Facebook, so I've been dragged kicking and…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 1 comment